Personality Type Assessment

personality example Assessment (Week-2 item-by-item Assignment) CMGT/530 IT Organizational Behavior July 1, 2012 Personality emblem Assessment The first subdivision of this report details the elements that a record flake judgment typic every last(predicate)y measures. The second section contains discussion on the nature guinea pig judicial last of the author of this paper. In the tierce and last section, the author sh atomic number 18s how his personal assessment outcomes could affect his work relationships with his colleagues. Elements of Personality Type AssessmentA reputation profile assessment is typically an objective sieve where an individual gives yes or no responses to a series of organized and deeply constructed behavioral and situational questions. These objective questions at a fundagenial level assesses the individuals cognitive moral process and orientations and based on the responses classifies the individual into unmatchable of the several dispositi on flakes. Each of these reputation types is associated with different sets of realistic behaviors and melt downencies that the individuals argon most likely to exhibit.This variety of reputation types is by a personality inventory framework called the Myers-Briggs Type index (MBTI), created by Isabel Briggs Myers after extensive examination and research on the theory of psychological types introduced in the 1920s by Carl G. Jung. At the basic level, the MBTI differentiates peoples cognitive functions in foursome-spot ways, as defined by four mutually exclusive couples of the dominant or likely mental preferences, and the combinations of these four pairs go out to a set of 16 personality types (MBTItoday. rg, n. d. ). The first pair of preferences, extroversion (E) and invagination (I), is for mental energy orientation. The extroverted individuals ar expressive, assertive, outgoing, sociable, and draw their mental energy from the interactions with the international ball. The introverted individuals are reflective, reserved, quiet, and draw their mental energy from the dwelling in the informal world of thoughts and ideas (Center for Applications of psychological Type, 2012).The second pair of preferences, sensing(S) and intuition (N), is for ir sane mental cognitive process related to perception and put across of information. The individuals with dominant sensing perception cost in the present moment and are practical. They prefer simplicity, clarity, routine, and order in their free-and-easy breaks. The individuals with dominant intuition perception are inspired by creativity and innovation, and think the possibilities for future. They are drawn to the big usher and abstract theoretical concepts (Center for Applications of psychological Type, 2012).The threesome pair of preferences, thinking (T) and tactile sensation (F), is for rational mental cognitive processes of forming judgments and making decisions. The individuals who to beg in with rely on their thinking for forming judgments are objective, analytical, and logical. They use logic, reason, and cause-effect analysis to handle every problems and tasks they face for achieving results. The individuals who primarily rely on their feelings for forming judgments rely on their personal emotions and protect system.They are concerned about meeting of their actions and decisions on other people (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 2012). The fourth pair of preferences, judging (J) and perceiving (P), is for mental orientation while dealing with right(prenominal) world. The individuals who prefer judging rely on the rational cognitive functions of thinking or feeling. They prefer the world around them to be structured, organized, and orderly. The individuals who prefer perceiving rely on the nonsensical cognitive functions of sensing and intuition.They typically are open, spontaneous, and flexible and look forward to experiencing the world in its nat ural state (Center for Applications of Psychological Type, 2012). Personality Type Self-Assessment The source use Jung typology test to complete the self assessment of his personal style and the results indicated that the source belongs to personality type ISFP that means the source prefers introversion over extroversion, sensing over intuition, feeling over thinking, and perceiving over judging (HumanMetrics, 2012).The source found himself taking the assessment test few more(prenominal) times to patronize the derived results. According to personality inventory of MBTI and the Myers and Briggs design (n. d. ), the individuals with personality type of ISFP sop up inclination to seek a peaceful, easygoing aliveness with a live and let live philosophy. They tend to enjoy life as it comes and define their own pace. They tend to be quiet, caring, considerate, and have a pleasant demeanor. They tend to be very devoted to their family and friends, and have a strong set of value t hat they cherish.They tend to dislike conflicts, disagreements, and imposing of their opinions on others (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. a). After looking at the results, the generator understood some of his own tendencies and consoled himself that he did not have to good at everything. He opined that the knowledge of these personality types trick help in development a deeper reasonableness of people around him. in any case while taking the assessment, for some of the questions the source was forced to choose yes or no when he believed the answer was neither, and there were no in-between options to choose from.So the writer agrees with Robbins & test (2011) that the problem with these assessment tests is that they force a person into one type or another. According to Mccaulley (1990) every person uses all eight processes (E, I, S, N, T, F, J, and P) but intrinsically prefers one of each opposite pair. In the chemical formula course of life, people develop preferences by doing what comes most naturally. As they grow onetime(a) and wiser, they develop as well as use more of the lesser pet processes (Mccaulley, 1990).Reflecting back on his life, the writer agrees the personality type ISFP correctly indicates his default tendencies. Moreover, the writer also believes that over the years he has developed more shades to his personality and has become more balanced. Effect of Personal Assessment The assessment provided an opportunity for the writer to do some self-introspection and become more aware of self. Also the knowledge and understanding of 16 distinctive personality types helped the writer to appreciate others possessing different personality types.When employees stub understand their type preferences, they can lift their work in a way of life that best suits their style, including managing their time, problem solving, best approaches to decision making, and dealing with stress (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. b) . The writer could medita te better the good and not-so-good relations he has experienced with his prior bosses and colleagues. The personality type assessment also helped the writer to go over his behavior with prior colleagues and identify the background signal for improving relationships with his colleagues at the workplace.As a bundle development manager in a leading health care organization, the writer will make use of the bare-ass understanding of his own personality to mitigate upon his managerial functions and his handling of the different situations. These functions includes managing others, developing leadership skills, organizing tasks, creating teams, training for management as well as staff, conflict resolution, motivation, coaching, diversity, credit rating as well as rewards, and tack management (Myers and Briggs Foundation, n. d. b) . References Center for Applications of Psychological Type. 2012). Mbti overview. Retrieved from http//www. capt. org/mbti-assessment/mbti-overview. htm Hu manMetrics. (2012). Jung typology test. Retrieved from http//www. humanmetrics. com/cgi-win/jtypes1. htm MBTItoday. org. (n. d. ). tale of the myers briggs type indicator. Retrieved from http//mbtitoday. org/about-the-mbti-indicator/a-mini-history-of-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator/ Mccaulley, M. H. (1990). The myers-briggs type indicator a measure for individuals.. Measurement & Evaluation In Counseling & Development (American Counseling Association), 22(4), 181.Retrieved from https//search. ebscohost. com/login. aspx? straight=true&db=f5h&AN=9705111082&site=eds-live Myers and Briggs Foundation. (n. d a). The 16 mbti types. Retrieved from http//www. myersbriggs. org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/the-16-mbti-types. aspISFP Myers and Briggs Foundation. (n. d. b). Mbti type at work. Retrieved from http//www. myersbriggs. org/type-use-for-everyday-life/mbti-type-at-work/ Robbins, S. P. , & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organization behavior (14th ed. ). New York, NY prentice Hall.